Final Preparations

How to describe the final weeks of the program? Chaotic progress...hmm, that works. We are collecting early drafts and looking at the progress in the project, analyizing user testing information, worked on the presentation outline for the capstone presentation, working on a summary of the cognitive walkthrough and heuristic analysis, and deciding what we each will bring to the potluck for next week. I'm amazed at the ability of everyone on the team. Thank you everyone.

User Testing

During our April 5th class with Dr. Butcher, we did user testing with other class members playing the role of the users. 7 people went through our website. Their words and some of their actions were recorded using Adobe Captivate (only 5 of the users were successfully recorded). The feedback we received was helpful. Changes have been made to parts of the powerpoint and bugs are being worked out on the drag and drop activity. Overall, users liked the junior scientist.

Presentation to our Clients and Class

In class tonight we presented our project in class tonight with Madlyn Runburg from the Utah Museum of Natural History in class with us. The feedback we were given from our client and our class provided good direction on our how continue develp the tutorial and make it more effective. Madlyn liked the flow of the website, the video, and the activities . Feedback she gave was to add options at the end of the module that would allow students to do more classification activities or to navigate to other pages on the Museum's website (i.e.- the observation module or the websites main page). She also thought more specific feeback, besides "great job", would be more beneficial. Feedback from our classmates were to give an overview of what would happen during the module at the beginning so students to give the students more context as to what they would be doing (creating their own exhibit) and would have an idea of how long the module would take to complete; to make the video a larger part of the webpage; a progress bar of something for users to see as they work through the site; a way for students to see how many answers they got right/wrong; is there a way to add text of the script; the videos might be more effective if they had a more neutral background or something more simple; on the bird exercise, the text and options need to be bigger because they seem small against the larger bird pictures; Second tier activity- what does this mean? Did we already define what the second tier is for the student? I got a bit lost at this point; it would be useful if users get feedback on incorrect answers. We were a little worried about what the Museum folks were going to say about the direction the project has went in, but Madlyn liked what see saw. YEA! Presentation to client: done!

Creation is a Process

As we approach the end of March and the one month count down until our project is due, the past few weeks have been a reminder of the process of creation. Assignments in both Dr. Butcher's class and Dr. Zheng's class, while not enthusiastically welcomed, have helped move things along. One thing that was insightful was presenting in Dr. Zheng's class on March 17th. We were able to show parts of the website and PowerPoint that have been done and to describe the direction we're heading in with the remainder of our project. Having one new set of eyes look over something is helpful and with the 8 more sets of eyes looking over our project we received valuable feedback. The feedback and questions from Dr. Zheng and our classmates was both insightful and a confidence boost. Feedback was given to clarify and change a few things in the Fact or Fiction PowerPoint and other areas of our project (I really tried to remember the other things that were said!). It was good to hear from Dr. Zheng that we have made progress.

NHK Coverage of Tsunami - Miyagi Prefecture, Sendai Airport

Talking with Butcher

On February 8th and 15th, we had a chance as a group to talk with Kirsten Butcher, our Human-Computer Interaction teacher, about our meetings with the Museum and our on going unfolding of the classification module. Her feedback has been very helpful. We have been stressing to come up with a design that keeps our clints happy, while at the same time being true to good design principles.

It seems that Museum wants to take the classroom experience of helping students learn to classify and put it on the computer. The problem with this is that they are two different ways to teaching, with different strengths and limitations. Face to face interaction allows the instructor to give verbal and non-verbal feedback to students based on their observation of the students. A computer doesn't pick up on non-verbal cues from people. It cannot see that a student is becoming frustrated due to a lack of understanding and then adjust the instruction to solve that problem. One of the strengths of a computer is being able to give honest, instantaneous feeback to an individual student.

So, after with talking with Dr. Butcher, we realize we need to be better at designing a learning module that draws on the strengths of computer technology- honest, instantaneous feedback. Students need to interact with a module that provides scaffolding, direction toward the scientific focus of classifying, and feedback that helps them see that they have been successful or that they made a mistake.

Now fast forward to today, Febuary 11th. We presented a ROUGH prototype of our project to our capstone class, taught by Dr. Zheng. We received great feedback from classmates (i.e.- when a student picks a characteristic to classify by and clicks a radio button, the pictures of each bird could zoom in on that feature to help students focus on one thing and to give them a close-up view of the feature they picked). Dr. Zheng talked about the interactivity of the concept attainment part of our project. He was wondering if we were going to ask students what good classication was, or were we just going to tell them. We need to ensure that students are given 0pportunity to discover or the activity won't fit the description of a concept attainment activity. He also wanted to us to address students background knowledge of birds. We need to make sure learners understand enough about birds to know what characteristics they will be using to classify them. Dr. Zheng also was happy about the phrase that learners would being asked to "create their own exhibits at the museum".

Curator Video Script 1st version

Just done the draft for three curator video scripts.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=1IS4L9gBXLgyhFyMkq0JN0xEkGB020s5npm0c-kTtP0kwJYnSF7_mbiUZt9sv&hl=en

Referenced Heather's suggestion as below for the C2 video. So the two examples go from simple observation to deeper specimen classification.

Several things need to discuss with Cathy and our group

1. The way we scaffold and model the students in our videos.

2. Proper video length. I tried to time my script, they are all a bit longer than we first discussed (30 seconds or so), each video may take around 60 to 90 seconds. So I think we need to add it to our interview questions asking them how long is suitable and won't blow the 4th grader's away.

3. For the filming time, it looks like the museum is ready. But I'm wondering if we need to get it done asap or wait for more possible revisions.

One suggestion, we would like to steer away from saying classification schemes are more or less scientific- we want them to understand when they classify or sort what they are doing is scientific, but we would like them to realize there are different levels of sophistication. So you could talk about really easily observed features/characteristics that you can group by, or how you can take some time to really observe specimens and find out a lot more about them and sort them according to those observations, and how that helps you learn and share more with other scientists. I think it is important that it is discussed about how your classification schemes have to be based on observations, and words like “cool”, “scary” or “ugly” can’t work because they may mean things to different people, and don’t really tell us about the specimens.